Body Electric - A Santa Barbara Network For Active Women And Girls
A Santa Barbara Network For Active Women And Girls
Home Programs History The Buzz Why Be Fit?
People Adventure Club Links Support Title IX Donate

  The Buzz

May/June, 2005

The following are articles taken from our bimonthly newsletter, The Buzz. If you would like to subscribe to the electronic or hard copy version, please let us know.

TITLE IX UNDER ATTACK AGAIN?

On March 17, the Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights (OCR) issued an "additional clarification" of its policy regarding Title IX compliance.

In this letter, the OCR refers to a "model survey", which "institutions can rely on as an acceptable method to measure students' interests in participating in sports," as a way of clarifying prong three of the three-prong test spelled out in Title IX's participation requirement.

The three prongs used to evaluate Title IX compliance are:

  1. the percentage of male and female athletes is substantially proportionate to the percentage of male and female students enrolled at the school,

  2. the school has shown a history and continuing practice of expanding participation opportunities for the underrepresented sex, and

  3. the school is fully and effectively accommodating the interests and abilities of the underrepresented sex.

Regarding prong three, the "model survey" being promoted by the OCR will allow schools to survey their female students to determine interest in sports, in order to determine whether the school is fully and effectively accommodating their interests and abilities.

According to the Women's Sports Foundation, "The gist of the letter is that schools in which females are underrepresented in athletics compared to their proportion in the general student body. . . and that have not demonstrated a history and continuing practice of expanding opportunities for the underrepresented sex . . .would be deemed in compliance with the law under Prong three of the athletic participation provision if they simply e-mailed a 'model survey' to current students to determine their interests and abilities and found interest by the underrepresented sex to be lacking."

What's wrong with this approach? Just about everything. The Women's Sports Foundation (WSF), in their response to the letter, makes five key points about the misguided policy clarification.

1. A "Survey" Is An Invalid Measure of Interest in


Participation

WSF says, "Experts in the use of survey instruments have condemned the use of surveys of interest - which measure attitude - as a way to predict behavior."

"Given their historic and current exclusion from a fair share of participation opportunities and this cultural bias, women are less likely to profess an interest in sports, even if they are interested! However, professing interest does not predict behavior and cannot be used to predict actual levels of participation when nondiscriminatory opportunities are made available."

2. Male Athletes Have Never Been Required to Prove Interest In Order To Obtain Participation Opportunities

The "model surveys" will be sent by e-mail to students. The OCR letter states, "Although rates of nonresponse may be high with the e-mail procedure, under these conditions, OCR will interpret such nonresponse as a lack of interest."

This means that if young women do not respond to their e-mail, this will be interpreted as lack of interest in sports. Male athletes do not have to fear losing sports participation opportunities for not replying to their e-mail, nor do they have to prove their interest in the first place.

3. Reliance on Existing Student Body for Assessment is

Wrong

WSF says, “In the most comprehensive and accepted case on the topic, Cohen v. Brown University, a federal appeals court stated that the type of survey the department has proposed to gauge compliance under the third prong was ‘illogical’ and ‘circular’ in its reasoning.”

The court stated, “What students are present on campus to participate in a survey of interests has already been predetermined through the recruiting practices of the coaches.

What teams are established and can recruit or qualify for admissions preferences has already been predetermined by Brown. Thus, the interest present on campus is controlled by Brown; to then suggest that Brown must only satisfy the relative interests of students present on campus is circular.”

In other words, the students who are interested in sports are already playing sports; they were recruited to play sports from their high schools, not from the current student body.

4. Disincentive for Schools and Colleges to Develop Club

Sports

WSF says, "The letter explains that the presumption of compliance can only be overcome if the OCR finds direct and very persuasive evidence of unmet interest, such as if a school either discontinues a viable existing team or if they fail to upgrade a club team to varsity status when there is recent, broad-based petition from an existing club team."

This means that a school will only be found noncompliant if an existing varsity team is discontinued, or if a club team petitions for varsity status, thus demonstrating interest and ability. However, if a club team doesn't already exist, there is no way for a "broad-based petition" to exist.

5. Model Survey as Sole Litmus Test Defies Current Legal

Authority

WSF says, "While every legal authority has held that this survey practice cannot be made the sole litmus test for compliance under Prong three of Title IX, the letter sets up just a situation, totally reversing the current standard."

"Dependence on a single survey methodology also cancels the Department of Education's own 1979 Policy Interpretation. . ." and "While a student survey may be part of a remedy to determine what sports to add when an institution's current program fails Prong Three, it is not a proper test upon which to base compliance."

The clarification letter can be found online here:

http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/title9guidanceadditional.html


The full user's guide and manual, including the survey, can be found here:

http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/title9guidanceadditional.pdf

The Women's Sports Foundation's position paper is here:

http://www.womenssportsfoundation.org/cgi-bin/iowa/issues/rights/article.html?record=1009

PLEASE NOTE: This directive is already in place, with no public notice or comment.

In order to overturn the Department of Education's action, legislation will be required. This can only happen if we call, e-mail or visit our legislators!

You can send an e-mail from this site:

http://capwiz.com/wsf/mail/oneclick_compose/?alertid=7385331

Please use this form to write to your U.S. Senators and Representatives to ask that they contact DOE Secretary Spelling immediately to ask that the March 17 Title IX clarification be revoked.

Thank you!

NEW TITLE IX RESOURCE

Visit www.titleix.info for a new site called, “I Exercise My Rights,” a public service informational campaign to educate the public about all aspects of Title IX.

Athletics is only one of ten key areas addressed by Title IX; “I Exercise My Rights” provides resources for education and advocacy.

ADVENTURE CLUB CALENDAR

Surfing - May 21 Belly

Dancing - June 2

For more info, contact adventureclub@bodyelectric-sb.org or 805.569.7144, ext. *2


ELLEN'S JOURNAL

Part three in a series, the following is an excerpt of the journal of Ellen Durham, a woman who works full time, volunteers for Body Electric, and is starting a new business on the side.

With our journal series we bring you the challenges and accomplishments of an average woman: someone who, like all of us, balances a life full of work, play, friends, family and occasional struggle.

We hope you find inspiration in their daily endeavors, and perhaps decide to try something new and challenging yourself!



March 6th - So I am still working out! I am walking nearly every day – and yesterday I went to the top of La Cumbre peak! I hiked all the way up and back. Eleven miles! If my neighbors had told me that I was going to be hiking eleven miles I am not sure I would have gone, but I am glad that I did it – I am thrilled to know I can do it – and I would do it again.

I went for a walk today to make sure that the muscles wouldn’t tighten up too much. I feel like someone else is living in my body – I mean, who would have thought I would one day be going for a walk to relieve the tightness in my muscles?

I am also changing my food intake. I have a giant bowl of fruit on the table and whenever I feel like snacking I go to the bowl! I am eating better than I have in years and I am really enjoying it.

March 17th - I have been walking all week – the outrigger season has started and I am joining the women on the water this Saturday. I am looking forward to getting out there again.

I’m shifting in size and had to make a trip to the store to buy a smaller pair of jeans – a double luck week as I saw the drafts for my new business website too. They look great and I am hoping to launch the business in the next month or so.

It’s a bit nerve-wracking and it applies directly to my self-esteem and fitness as there’s this part of me that peeks out at the world and thinks, “Do I really deserve to run my own business and am I crazy to think this will really work?”

I have a clipping near my bed that inspires me to work out – It reads, ‘80% of women identified as key leaders in Fortune 500 companies played sports during their childhood.” I read that just about every other day and think how much I learned from playing – but did not realize it until I read that quote.

March 28th - I have not yet made it to outrigger practice on the water – seems like between starting up my business, working full time and trying to take care of myself I am running out of time.

Soon I leave for vacation for a few days. It feels stressful getting ready to go. I have all this stuff to finish up for the end of my work quarter; my business is moving forward, plus caring for the family and the dogs. I am clearly overwhelmed and in need of a vacation, so why is taking one adding more stress?

April 2nd - There is no air here. I am in New Mexico visiting my folks and the elevation is over 7,000 feet. Both Ray and I are suffering from the thin air and being winded at climbing a flight of stairs. I have been drinking water every hour to compensate for the lack of air.

April 4th - We are back at sea level!

We went for a 3-mile walk right after having a quick snack so we could stretch our legs and get some exercise. It feels great to breathe deeply again and not have my asthma aggravated by the lack of air.

April 9th - Yesterday I met a friend for coffee and we discussed how what we see in the mirror isn’t what is really there. How do we determine what we really see and what is real?

The weather lately has not been cooperating with my need to walk. I know I could go to the gym and work out; the idea of working out indoors away from the sunshine is not motivating to me.

April 18th - I was in the Bay Area most of last week and got no real workout in.

I decided that since I couldn’t really work out, that I would stand a lot during the daylong meetings. I read an article that described the habits of couch potatoes; one set who stood more often and walked to the corner market instead of driving maintained a lower body weight overall.

It inspired me to stand in the meeting and take the long way to the ladies room to make up for having to spend the day in meetings.

Read more articles in the Buzz Archives...

Home |History | The Buzz | Links | People | Adventure Club | Why Be Fit? | Support | Programs | Title IX |Donate

Body Electric PO Box 591  Santa Barbara, California  93102   805.569.7144

bodyelectric@bodyelectric-sb.org